PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Exceptional Children1 citationsOpen Access

Adaptation and Multi-Methods Validation of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI)

View Full Paper
JLJames LeeAustin CollegeVKVeronica Y. KangUniversity of Maryland, College ParkSJSean JooUniversity of Kansas

Key Points

  • The study aims to adapt and validate the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI) for assessing EI providers’ cultural self-efficacy.
  • Adapted 32 items into the CSES-EI using a modified Delphi method.
  • Surveyed 201 EI providers from various professional backgrounds.
  • Conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for data analysis.
  • CSES-EI showed strong internal consistency (α = .91, ω = .94).
  • Identified a three-factor structure accounting for 47.9% of the variance.
  • Thematic analysis revealed a focus on family-centered coaching and cultural competence.

Abstract

It is widely known that marginalized families of young children with disabilities have inequitable access to evidence-based practices within publicly funded systems of care, such as the Part C early intervention (EI) system. One factor contributing to this inequality is providers’ limited cultural self-efficacy, which can be defined as the confidence and competence to engage effectively with families from different cultural or linguistic backgrounds than their own. However, little is known about how to assess cultural self-efficacy specifically among EI providers. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI), a scale to assess EI providers’ cultural self-efficacy when working with marginalized families. We used a modified Delphi method to adapt 32 items from an original scale into the CSES-EI. A total of 201 EI providers from diverse professional backgrounds completed the survey. Data analysis involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multiple regression to assess the reliability, validity, and underlying structure of the scale. The CSES-EI demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .91, ω = .94) and a three-factor structure accounting for 47.9% of the variance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed that EI providers emphasized family-centered coaching, cultural competence, and the need for flexibility when working with marginalized families. Findings underscore the importance of culturally responsive practices in EI and suggest that professional development targeting cultural efficacy is essential for improving service delivery with diverse populations. This validated tool provides a foundation for assessing and enhancing cultural self-efficacy among EI providers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e58f78050d08c1b75bb1https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261433795
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper