PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1993The Quarterly Journal of Economics3,822 citations

Corruption

View Full Paper
ASAndrei ShleiferRVRobert W. Vishny

Key Points

  • Examine how governmental institutional structures determine corruption levels and analyze why illicit corruption imposes greater economic distortions than taxation.
  • Formulated theoretical economic propositions connecting political processes and agency coordination to corrupt behavior.
  • Evaluated the developmental and distortionary consequences of corruption resulting from its illegality and secrecy demands relative to formal taxation.
  • Weak central governments that fail to control and coordinate their individual bureaucratic agencies face substantially higher levels of corruption.
  • The necessity of secrecy and illegality makes corruption significantly more distortionary and economically damaging to development than standard taxation.

Abstract

This paper presents two propositions about corruption. First, the structure of government institutions and of the political process are very important determinants of the level of corruption. In particular, weak governments that do not control their agencies experience very high corruption levels. Second, the illegality of corruption and the need for secrecy make it much more distortionary and costly than its sister activity, taxation. These results may explain why, in some less developed countries, corruption is so high and so costly to development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shleifer et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da222884371aa676a3cb20https://doi.org/10.2307/2118402
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper