PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2017Critical Care244 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit

EFEli J. FinkelszteinDJDaniel S. JonesCKC. Kevin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In patients with suspected infection who eventually required admission to the ICU, qSOFA calculated before their ICU admission had greater accuracy than SIRS for predicting mortality and ICU-free days. However, it may be less clear whether qSOFA is also better than SIRS criteria for predicting ventilator free-days and organ dysfunction-free days. These findings may help clinicians gain further insight into the usefulness of qSOFA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Finkelsztein et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da53e394a959ed41a3c596https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper