PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2005Thinking & Reasoning407 citations

Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning

View Full Paper
JEJonathan St. B. T. EvansJCJodie Curtis-Holmes

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this study, we examine the belief bias effect in syllogistic reasoning under both standard presentation and in a condition where participants are required to respond within 10 seconds. As predicted, the requirement for rapid responding increased the amount of belief bias observed on the task and reduced the number of logically correct decisions, both effects being substantial and statistically significant. These findings were predicted by the dual-process account of reasoning, which posits that fast heuristic processes, responsible for belief bias, compete with slower analytic processes that can lead to correct logical decisions. Requiring rapid responding thus differentially inhibits the operation of analytic reasoning processes, leading to the results observed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da66d6e6ab964fb083656ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/13546780542000005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Necessity, Possibility and Belief: A Study of Syllogistic Reasoning2001 · 89 citations
  2. 2Syllogistic reasoning time: Disconfirmation disconfirmed2003 · 64 citations
  3. 3Inspection times, the change task, and the rapid-response selection task2001 · 19 citations
  4. 4Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning1999 · 1,115 citations
  5. 5On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning1983 · 848 citations