PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2022Physics of Fluids470 citationsOpen Access

Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations

HEHamidreza EivaziMTMojtaba TahaniPSPhilipp Schlatter

Key Points

  • Assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible laminar and turbulent flows relying solely on boundary data without explicit turbulence models.
  • Tested PINNs on laminar flows by solving the Falkner–Skan boundary layer equation across strong pressure gradients.
  • Applied PINNs to four turbulent flow benchmarks: zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer, adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layer, flow over a NACA4412 airfoil, and flow over a periodic hill using only boundary data.
  • Achieved prediction errors of less than 1% in laminar flow regimes with strong pressure gradients.
  • Attained high simulation accuracy across all four turbulent flow cases, successfully recovering Reynolds-stress components without empirical turbulence assumptions.

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are successful machine-learning methods for the solution and identification of partial differential equations. We employ PINNs for solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible turbulent flows without any specific model or assumption for turbulence and by taking only the data on the domain boundaries. We first show the applicability of PINNs for solving the Navier–Stokes equations for laminar flows by solving the Falkner–Skan boundary layer. We then apply PINNs for the simulation of four turbulent-flow cases, i.e., zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer, adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layer, and turbulent flows over a NACA4412 airfoil and the periodic hill. Our results show the excellent applicability of PINNs for laminar flows with strong pressure gradients, where predictions with less than 1% error can be obtained. For turbulent flows, we also obtain very good accuracy on simulation results even for the Reynolds-stress components.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eivazi et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa815a6045d71bfa3d814https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0095270
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper