PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2011Insecta mundi107 citations

Adding Value to Ecological Risk Assessment with Population Modeling

View Full Paper
VFValery E. ForbesPCPeter CalowVGVolker Grimm

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current measures used to estimate the risks of toxic chemicals are not relevant to the goals of the environmental protection process, and thus ecological risk assessment (ERA) is not used as extensively as it should be as a basis for cost-effective management of environmental resources. Appropriate population models can provide a powerful basis for expressing ecological risks that better inform the environmental management process and thus that are more likely to be used by managers. Here we provide at least five reasons why population modeling should play an important role in bridging the gap between what we measure and what we want to protect. We then describe six actions needed for its implementation into management-relevant ERA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Forbes et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa9e6e6ab964fb0836712https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2011.552391
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Erratum: Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? (Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18 (1544-1556))1999 · 88 citations
  2. 2Why Has Ecological Risk Assessment Found Such Limited Application?2009 · 19 citations
  3. 3Demographic Toxicity2008 · 23 citations
  4. 4Individual-based Modeling and Ecology2005 · 1,939 citations
  5. 5The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help2008 · 191 citations