PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1971Journal of Mathematical Sociology4,973 citations

Dynamic models of segregation†

View Full Paper
TSThomas C. Schelling

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Some segregation results from the practices of organizations, some from specialized communication systems, some from correlation with a variable that is non‐random; and some results from the interplay of individual choices. This is an abstract study of the interactive dynamics of discriminatory individual choices. One model is a simulation in which individual members of two recognizable groups distribute themselves in neighborhoods defined by reference to their own locations. A second model is analytic and deals with compartmented space. A final section applies the analytics to 'neighborhood tipping.' The systemic effects are found to be overwhelming: there is no simple correspondence of individual incentive to collective results. Exaggerated separation and patterning result from the dynamics of movement. Inferences about individual motives can usually not be drawn from aggregate patterns. Some unexpected phenomena, like density and vacancy, are generated. A general theory of 'tipping' begins to emerge. Notes This study was sponsored by The RAND Corporation with funds set aside for research in areas of special interest, and was issued as RM‐6014‐RC in May 1969. The views expressed are not necessarily those of RAND or its sponsors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas C. Schelling (1971) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dab48faae38ff6ad835fb8https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1971.9989794
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper