PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2008Journal of Applied Psychology268 citations

A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions.

View Full Paper
TSTraci SitzmannKBKenneth G. BrownWCWendy J. Casper

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A review and meta-analysis of studies assessing trainee reactions are presented. Results suggest reactions primarily capture characteristics of the training course, but trainee characteristics (e.g., anxiety and pretraining motivation) and organizational support also have a moderate effect on reactions. Instructional style (rho = .66) followed by human interaction (rho = .56) were the best predictors of reactions. Reactions predicted pre-to-post changes in motivation (beta = .51) and self-efficacy (beta = .24) and were more sensitive than affective and cognitive learning outcomes to trainees' perceptions of characteristics of the training course. Moderator analyses revealed reactions- outcomes correlations tended to be stronger in courses that utilized a high level rather than a low level of technology, and affective and utility reactions did not differ in their relationships with learning outcomes. The current study clarifies the nomological network of reactions and specifies outcomes that are theoretically related to reactions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sitzmann et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dac41a8988aeabbe687acdhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper