PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1998Journal of Neurotrauma2,405 citations

Structured Interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for Their Use

View Full Paper
LWLindsay WilsonLPLaura E. L. PettigrewGTGraham M. Teasdale

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is the most widely used outcome measure after traumatic brain injury, but it is increasingly recognized to have important limitations. It is proposed that shortcomings of the GOS can be addressed by adopting a standard format for the interview used to assign outcome. A set of guidelines are outlined that are directed at the main problems encountered in applying the GOS. The guidelines cover the general principles underlying the use of the GOS and common practical problems of applying the scale. Structured interview schedules are described for both the five-point GOS and an extended eight-point GOS (GOSE). An interrater reliability study of the structured interviews for the GOS and GOSE yielded weighted kappa values of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. It is concluded that assessment of the GOS using a standard format with a written protocol is practical and reliable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilson et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db1d0837b5141e3ba3cd0fhttps://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1998.15.573
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper