PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026ACS ES&T Water0 citationsOpen Access

Microbial Growth Curve Framework Provides Insights for Controlling Opportunistic Pathogens in Building Plumbing

View Full Paper
TOTolulope OdimayomiAPAmy PrudenMEMarc A. Edwards

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate how water retention time affects microbial growth and pathogen presence in building plumbing systems.
  • Evaluated water retention times from 1 to 21 days in a building plumbing rig.
  • Measured chloramine levels between <0.2 and 2.5 mg/L as Cl2.
  • Assessed microbial growth phases through total cell counts and Legionella pneumophila levels.
  • Explored effects of various control measures like temperature and disinfectants.
  • Identified a peak in bulk water total cell counts and L. pneumophila at around 7 days of water retention time.
  • Observed a decay in microbial levels by up to 90% at higher retention times.
  • Demonstrated that excessive flushing may not reduce microbial risk as previously thought.

Abstract

The perception that high water retention time (WRT) in buildings increases microbial and pathogen growth drives costly flushing interventions, which lack a scientific framework to guide effective implementation. Here, we evaluate the effect of WRT from 1 to 21 days in an at-scale building plumbing rig with influent chloramine residuals of <0.2–2.5 mg/L as Cl2 and water heater set points of 40 and 60 °C. We found that the classic microbial growth curve consisting of lag, exponential growth, stationary, and decay phases provided a robust explanation of trends in bulk water total cell counts (TCC) and Legionella pneumophila over a wide range of conditions. We extended this observation to develop a framework to understand how various controls and operating conditions act to stop (e.g., cold temperatures, disinfectant) or reset (e.g., pasteurization in water heaters killing microbes and recycling nutrients) the growth curve as a function of WRT. Bulk water TCC and L. pneumophila reached a consistent peak/plateau at a building WRT of ∼7 days before decaying up to 90% at higher WRT. These findings suggest that recent guidelines recommending weekly flushing of buildings may sometimes be counterproductive and that very high WRT does not necessarily indicate microbial risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Odimayomi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37254fe01fead37c524ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c01431
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Framework Incorporating Water Ages with <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> Growth Rates2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Increased flushing frequency of a model plumbing system initially promoted the formation of viable but non culturable cells but ultimately reduced the concentration of culturable and total Legionella DNA2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Premise Plumbing “CT” (PPCT) as a Control Parameter for Opportunistic Pathogens2026
  4. 4Impact of Premise Plumbing Design, Velocity, and Operational Factors on Microbial Activity During Stagnation in Pipes2025
  5. 5Flushing Temporarily Reduces Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and Nitrifiers in a Full-Scale Chloraminated Drinking Water Distribution System2026