PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Medicine Science and the Law1 citationsOpen Access

Considering the assessment of survivability and preventability following mass fatality incidents: Where are we and where do we need to go?

View Full Paper
CECarl EvansBSBenjamin M. C. SwiftAHAmy Hughes

Key Points

  • This paper aims to review existing methodologies for assessing survivability and preventability following mass fatality incidents.
  • Reviewed existing techniques for assessing survivability and preventability.
  • Evaluated recommendations from the UK Home Office report on forensic pathology.
  • Analyzed learning from the Hillsborough disaster and Manchester Arena bombing inquests.
  • Current methodologies for assessing survivability and preventability are inconsistent.
  • A need for standardised processes was identified to improve future inquiries.
  • Recommendations for a national best practice framework were proposed.

Abstract

Following a mass fatality incident, the assessment of survivability and preventability is essential, yet current methodologies remain inconsistent both within the UK and internationally. The 2024 UK Home Office report 'The Patronising Disposition of Unaccountable Power: Independent Review of Forensic Pathology' evaluated learning from the Hillsborough disaster and the Manchester Arena bombing inquests, highlighting the urgent need for clearer, standardised processes in determining survivability and preventability. This paper critically reviews existing techniques in use to address the question of survivability and preventability and makes recommendations for a national best practice framework to improve this process for future inquiries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37254fe01fead37c526chttps://doi.org/10.1177/00258024261437516
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper