PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Engineering Construction & Architectural Management1 citations

Developing a policy framework and implementation guidelines for modular construction adoption in Australia: a systematic review

View Full Paper
HCHo Hin ChanPAPrince Antwi-AfariRYRongrong Yu

Key Points

  • The study aims to create a structured policy framework and implementation guide to enhance modular construction adoption in Australia.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analyzed 63 relevant publications to identify thematic barriers and enablers.
  • Performed content analysis to extract drivers and policy trends.
  • Identified five policy barriers hindering modular construction adoption in Australia.
  • Recognized six policy enablers supporting successful implementation.
  • Integrated insights from international practices and the local Australian context.

Abstract

Purpose Modular construction (MC) is gaining global attention for its potential to deliver improved efficiency, safety, and sustainability in the built environment. However, despite these benefits, Australia’s adoption of MC remains comparatively low. Given the critical role of government in shaping industry direction, effective policy intervention is essential to accelerate MC uptake. This study, therefore, aims to develop a policy framework – supported by a practical implementation guide – to better position Australia to harness the full benefits of MC. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 63 relevant publications were identified and analyzed. Afterward, a thorough content analysis was done to extract recurring thematic barriers, drivers, policy positions and implementation trends. Findings The review identified five policy barriers constraining MC adoption and six policy enablers that support its successful implementation. The findings integrate insights from both international experiences and the Australian MC policy landscape, offering a balanced understanding of global trends and local realities. Research limitations/implications Theoretically, this research advances the development of structured policy framework and implementation guide to support MC adoption in Australia. Practically, it provides policymakers with a clear, evidence-informed pathway to strengthen MC capability, encourage innovation and enable the broader uptake of modular technologies across the Australian construction sector. Originality/value The study proposed a forward-looking policy framework that consolidates the fragmented knowledge on MC adoption. To ensure its relevance for Australia, the framework is complemented by an implementation guide outlining actionable steps that policymakers and industry stakeholders can follow.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37964fe01fead37c5a35https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2025-1276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Key barriers and mitigation strategies towards sustainable prefabricated construction – a case of developing economies2024 · 16 citations
  2. 2Uptake of Industry 4.0 technologies in Australian construction firms2025 · 12 citations
  3. 3Analysing multifaceted barriers to modular construction in sustainable building projects: a comprehensive evaluation using multi-criteria decision making2024 · 31 citations
  4. 4Assessment of Feasibility, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors of MiC Projects in Hong Kong2020 · 49 citations
  5. 5Offsite construction adoption in Jordan: an exploration of professionals’ opinions2025 · 1 citations