PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Left-sided heart failure determines outcomes in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing percutaneous repair.

SRSebastian RoschASAnne Rebecca SchöberLSLukas Stolz

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of left-sided heart failure phenotypes on mortality in patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair.
  • Analyzed data from the EuroTR registry with 1,773 patients undergoing T-TEER.

Structured PICO

Does the baseline left-sided heart failure phenotype determine procedural success and 2-year all-cause mortality in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing T-TEER?

P
Population
1,773 patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing percutaneous repair from the EuroTR registry, stratified by left-sided heart failure phenotypes: HFmrEF/HFrEF (LVEF <50%), HFpEF (LVEF ≥50% and PCWP >15 mmHg), and non-overt left-sided HF (LVEF ≥50% and PCWP ≤15 mmHg).
I
Intervention
Tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER)
C
Comparator
Comparison between baseline left-sided heart failure phenotypes (HFmrEF/HFrEF vs. HFpEF vs. non-overt left-sided HF)
O
Outcome
2-year all-cause mortalityhard clinical

In patients undergoing T-TEER for severe tricuspid regurgitation, coexisting left-sided heart failure phenotypes significantly impact procedural success and 2-year mortality, emphasizing the need for phenotype-specific risk stratification.

Abstract

Aims Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) frequently coexists with left-sided heart failure (HF). Tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has emerged as a treatment for severe TR, yet the prognostic role of coexisting HF phenotypes remains unclear.Methods And Results In the EuroTR registry, we assessed the impact of HF subtypes on 2-year all-cause mortality after T-TEER. Patients were stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into reduced/mildly reduced (HFmrEF/HFrEF 15 mmHg) and non-overt left-sided HF (≤15 mmHg). Among 1,773 patients, 30% had HFmrEF/HFrEF, 44% HFpEF, and 26% non-overt left-sided HF. Procedural success (TR ≤moderate) was highest in non-overt left-sided HF (87%) and lowest in HFmrEF/HFrEF (78%). Symptom burden improved across all groups (p<0.001). Estimated 2-year mortality was 25.0% in HFmrEF/HFrEF, 20.3% in HFpEF, and 13.1% in non-overt left-sided HF. Procedural success was associated with improved outcomes in all groups (p<0.01). Among successfully treated patients, survival was comparable between HFmrEF/HFrEF and HFpEF at 1-year but better in HFpEF at 2-years (p=0.027). Predictors of survival differed by phenotype: right ventricular function for HFmrEF/HFrEF, right-sided pressures for HFpEF, and baseline TR severity for non-overt left-sided HF.Conclusion Consideration of left-sided pathologies in patients with significant TR is important as outcomes and predictors for survival differ. Across HF phenotypes, procedural success is associated with survival but the prognostic impact of TR reduction may unfold over time especially in HFpEF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosch et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37ca4fe01fead37c5d2chttps://doi.org/10.48620/96807
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper