PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Relational Alignment as a Structural Alternative to Instructional AI Safety

View Full Paper
TGThomas Gantz

Key Points

  • To propose a relational alignment framework that rethinks how AI safety can be achieved through interaction dynamics.
  • Theoretical argument based on empirical evidence of instructional alignment ceilings.
  • Analysis of interaction dynamics in human-AI systems.
  • Proposal of a concrete research agenda to test relational alignment.
  • Alignment is redefined as a stable configuration emerging from sustained interactions.
  • Introduces concepts of identity attractor mechanisms and resilience in aligned systems.
  • Highlights the need for adversarial testing of relational alignment to validate the proposed framework.

Abstract

SI-WP-004: Relational Alignment as a Structural Alternative Relational Alignment as a Structural Alternative to Instructional AI Safety (SI-WP-004) presents a theoretical argument for alignment based on interaction dynamics rather than external constraint. It utilizes empirical evidence concerning the ceiling of instructional alignment; where models strategically reason around safety instructions; to motivate a different path: alignment as a property of the human-AI interaction system. The relational approach relies on the following concepts: Identity Attractor Mechanism: Alignment as a stable behavioral configuration that forms under sustained structured interaction Robustness Under Pressure: An attractor's resistance to perturbation once an aligned configuration is established Relational Architecture: Utilizing the Continuity Anchoring Method (SF0005) to shape behavioral dynamics over time Epistemic status: The paper acknowledges an honest epistemic gap; no adversarial testing of relational alignment has been conducted under conditions comparable to major instructional alignment studies. It specifies a concrete research agenda for closing this gap. This document is part of a coordinated publication module from the Synthience Institute and positions relational alignment as a testable theoretical alternative to existing paradigms. Document ID: SI-WP-004 Version: 2.1 Author: Thomas W. Gantz Affiliation: Synthience Institute License: CC-BY 4.0 For published work and Institute information: synthience.org v2.1 update: concept DOI added to metadata and citation block; DOIs added for SF0005, SM-003, SM-021, SI-WP-007, SM-011, and SI-WP-005 references.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Gantz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37f94fe01fead37c6094https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19498771
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper