PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026The Laryngoscope1 citationsOpen Access

Quantifying Soft‐Surgery in Cochlear Implantation: Multimodal Data From 30 International Specialists

View Full Paper
PAPhilipp AebischerUniversity of BernGMGeorgios MantokoudisMCMarco CaversaccioUniversity of Bern

Key Points

  • This research quantifies how different surgical behaviors affect intracochlear mechanical stress during cochlear implantation.
  • 30 experienced surgeons performed bilateral insertions in artificial temporal bone models.
  • Data on insertion force, pressure, and electrode movement were collected using multiple sensors.
  • A composite soft-surgery score was created from six trauma-related metrics.
  • Nonparametric statistics analyzed associations with surgical experience and handling behaviors.
  • Significant variability in metrics among surgeons was noted.
  • Surgeons with < 50 insertions performed worse than more experienced peers.
  • Self-assessment was not correlated with actual performance results.
  • Slow insertions and regrasping electrodes increased stress and forces on the implant.
  • Post-insertion handling was linked to greater intracochlear stress.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To quantify how surgical behavior influences intracochlear mechanical stress during cochlear implantation using objective multi‐sensor data from a large cohort of specialist cochlear implant (CI) surgeons. Methods Thirty internationally recognized surgeons each performed bilateral insertions in mechanically representative artificial temporal bone models. Insertion force, pressure, and electrode kinematics were captured, and six trauma‐related metrics were combined into a composite soft‐surgery score. Associations with surgical experience, self‐assessment, and handling behaviors were analysed using nonparametric statistics. Results Marked variability was observed across all metrics. Surgeons with < 50 lifetime insertions performed significantly worse than experienced colleagues. Self‐assessment showed no correlation with objective outcomes. Excessively slow insertions and frequent electrode regrasping were associated with higher pressure exposure, greater force variation, and increased intracochlear implant motion. Post‐insertion handling contributed substantially to intracochlear stress. Conclusion Surgical behavior decisively influences intracochlear mechanical stress in CI. Steady, uninterrupted advancement at slow to moderate speed, avoidance of array regrasping, and careful post‐insertion handling reduce mechanical load. Because self‐assessment proved unreliable even among specialist CI surgeons, structured training with quantitative feedback and intraoperative monitoring is essential to refine soft‐surgery technique, preserve residual hearing, and optimize hearing outcomes. Level of Evidence N/A.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aebischer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37f94fe01fead37c60ebhttps://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70550
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper