PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2014Environmental Science and Pollution Research270 citationsOpen Access

Worldwide integrated assessment on systemic pesticides

MLMaarten Bijleveld van LexmondJBJean‐Marc BonmatinDGDave Goulson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In July 2009, a group of entomologists and ornithologists met at Notre Dame de Londres, a small village in the French department of Herault, as a result of an international enquiry amongst entomologists on the catastrophic decline of insects (and arthropods in general) all over Europe. They noted that a perceptible and gradual decline of insects, as part of the general impoverishment of the natural environment, had set in from the 1950s onwards. Amongstmany others, they recognized as root causes of this decline the intensification of agriculture with its accompanying loss of natural habitats and massive use of pesticides and herbicides, the manifold increase in roads and motorized traffic as well as a continent-wide nocturnal light pollution and nitrogen deposition. They equally agreed that a further degradation of the situation, a steeper decline in insect populations, had started in the decade 1990–2000. This first began inwestern Europe, followed by eastern and southern Europe, is nowadays apparent in the scarcity of insects splattered on windscreens of motorcars and squashed against their radiators and is best documented in the decline of butterflies and the global disorders amongst honey bees. They concluded that these phenomena reflected the now general collapse of Europe’s entomofauna. They also noted that the massive collapse of different species, genera and families of arthropods coincided with the severe decline of populations of different insectivorous bird species up to now considered as “common” such as swallows and starlings. On the basis of existing studies and numerous observations in the field as well as overwhelming circumstantial evidence, they came to the hypothesis that the new generation of pesticides, the persistent, systemic and neurotoxic neonicotinoids and fipronil, introduced in the early 1990s, are likely to be responsible at least in part for these declines. They, therefore, issued the Appeal of Notre Dame de Londres under the heading “No Silent Spring again” referring to Rachel Carson’s book “Silent Spring” then published almost half a century ago:

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lexmond et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db428d74ec16342183593dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3220-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Conclusions of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning2014 · 290 citations
  2. 2A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife2014 · 756 citations
  3. 3Alternatives to neonicotinoid insecticides for pest control: case studies in agriculture and forestry2014 · 143 citations
  4. 4Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil2014 · 1,365 citations
  5. 5Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids2010 · 1,877 citations