PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 8, 2014Journal of Applied Physiology688 citationsOpen Access

Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents

VHVincent T. van HeesZFZhou FangJLJoss Langford

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Wearable acceleration sensors are increasingly used for the assessment of free-living physical activity. Acceleration sensor calibration is a potential source of error. This study aims to describe and evaluate an autocalibration method to minimize calibration error using segments within the free-living records (no extra experiments needed). The autocalibration method entailed the extraction of nonmovement periods in the data, for which the measured vector magnitude should ideally be the gravitational acceleration (1 g); this property was used to derive calibration correction factors using an iterative closest-point fitting process. The reduction in calibration error was evaluated in data from four cohorts: UK (n = 921), Kuwait (n = 120), Cameroon (n = 311), and Brazil (n = 200). Our method significantly reduced calibration error in all cohorts (P 0.05). Temperature correction coefficients were highest for the z-axis, e.g., 19.6-mg offset per 5°C. Further, application of the autocalibration method had a significant impact on typical metrics used for describing human physical activity, e.g., in Brazil average wrist acceleration was 0.2 to 51% lower than uncalibrated values depending on metric selection (P < 0.01). The autocalibration method as presented helps reduce the calibration error in wearable acceleration sensor data and improves comparability of physical activity measures across study locations. Temperature ultization seems essential when temperature deviates substantially from the average temperature in the record but not for multiday summary measures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hees et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db42d0e6ab964fb0836e62https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00421.2014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper