PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2021SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología101 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of commonly used methods in random effects meta-analysis: application to preclinical data in drug discovery research

ETEzgi Tanriver-AyderAstraZeneca (Brazil)CFChristel FaesHasselt UniversityTCTom Van de CasteeleLundbeck (Denmark)

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Our findings highlight the importance of careful selection of the estimation method and the use of multivariable meta-regression to explain heterogeneity. There was no difference between REML and the Bayesian method and both methods are recommended over DL. Multiple meta-regression is worthwhile to explain heterogeneity by more than one variable, reducing more variability than any univariate models and increasing the explained proportion of heterogeneity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanriver-Ayder et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db57230d8d6ef495a3d51dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100074
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework2019 · 993 citations
  2. 2Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models.2009 · 389 citations
  3. 3Using AIC in multiple linear regression framework with multiply imputed data2012 · 62 citations
  4. 4The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments1954 · 5,469 citations
  5. 5Introduction to Meta‐Analysis2009 · 13,350 citations