PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2000Circulation1,481 citations

Randomized Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy With Implantable Defibrillators in Patients Resuscitated From Cardiac Arrest

View Full Paper
KKKarl-Heinz KuckRCRiccardo CappatoJSJürgen Siebels

Structured PICO

Does an implantable defibrillator reduce all-cause mortality in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest compared to amiodarone/metoprolol?

P
Population
Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest (cardiac arrest survivors)
I
Intervention
Implantable Defibrillator (ICD)
C
Comparator
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (amiodarone/metoprolol)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortalityhard clinical

In cardiac arrest survivors, ICD therapy provides a nonsignificant 23% reduction in all-cause mortality compared to amiodarone/metoprolol, with the benefit being more evident during the first 5 years.

Abstract

During long-term follow-up of cardiac arrest survivors, therapy with an ICD is associated with a 23% (nonsignificant) reduction of all-cause mortality rates when compared with treatment with amiodarone/metoprolol. The benefit of ICD therapy is more evident during the first 5 years after the index event.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuck et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbb1ea4e9a02dbaa6857adhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.7.748
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper