PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1996Journal of Management717 citations

Assessing the Non-Random Sampling Effects of Subject Attrition in Longitudinal Research

View Full Paper
JGJodi S. GoodmanWest Virginia UniversityTBTerry C. BlumGeorgia Institute of Technology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The potential effects of attrition in longitudinal research are addressed and a procedure for assessing its effects is recommended. We recommend that researchers assess the effects of subject attrition on their data by assessing: (1) the presence of non-random sampling using multiple logistic regression, (2) mean differences on the study’s variables between those who responded and did not respond to the subsequent data collection, (3) the restriction or enhancement of variances, and (4) changes in relationships among variables due to attrition. We demonstrate the procedure using data collected from a random sample of employed adults in the US regarding job satisfaction, job characteristics, demographics, and mood. In our data, subject attrition led to non-random sampling, affected the means and variances of some of the variables, but did not affect the relationships among the variables. The effects of subject attrition may be sample specific, but the procedure recommended for assessing its effects may be used in other data sets and substantive areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goodman et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbc773387cf70698688b2fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200405
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper