PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2003Journal of Clinical Microbiology338 citationsOpen Access

Epidemiology and Outcome of Nosocomial and Community-Onset Bloodstream Infection

View Full Paper
DDDaniel J. DiekemaSBSusan E. BeekmannKCKimberle C. Chapin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We performed a prospective study of bloodstream infection to determine factors independently associated with mortality. Between February 1999 and July 2000, 929 consecutive episodes of bloodstream infection at two tertiary care centers were studied. An ICD-9-based Charlson Index was used to adjust for underlying illness. Crude mortality was 24% (14% for community-onset versus 34% for nosocomial bloodstream infections). Mortality attributed to the bloodstream infection was 17% overall (10% for community-onset versus 23% for nosocomial bloodstream infections). Multivariate logistic regression revealed the independent associations with in-hospital mortality to be as follows: nosocomial acquisition (odds ratio OR 2.6, P 20000, P = 0.003), presence of a central venous catheter (OR 2.0, P = 0.0002), and presence of anaerobic organism (OR 2.5, P = 0.04). Even after adjustments were made for underlying illness and length of stay, nosocomial status of bloodstream infection was strongly associated with increased total hospital charges (P < 0.0001). Although accounting for about half of all bloodstream infections, nosocomial bloodstream infections account for most of the mortality and costs associated with bloodstream infection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diekema et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc12fc0648942b0a9c7db2https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.8.3655-3660.2003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper