PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2003Journal of Applied Psychology3,025 citations

Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.

View Full Paper
BBBernard M. BassBABruce J. AvolioDJDong I. Jung

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

How do leadership ratings collected from units operating under stable conditions predict subsequent performance of those units operating under high stress and uncertainty? To examine this question, the authors calculated the predictive relationships for the transformational and transactional leadership of 72 light infantry rifle platoon leaders for ratings of unit potency, cohesion, and performance for U.S. Army platoons participating in combat simulation exercises. Both transformational and transactional contingent reward leadership ratings of platoon leaders and sergeants positively predicted unit performance. The relationship of platoon leadership to performance was partially mediated through the unit's level of potency and cohesion. Implications, limitations, and future directions for leadership research are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bass et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc32a94f901957bec0fb8bhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transformational Leadership and Objective Performance in Banks1998 · 116 citations
  2. 2Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.1984 · 4,690 citations
  3. 3Reliability and Validity Assessment2011 · 5,083 citations
  4. 4Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment1995 · 774 citations
  5. 5Termination: When the therapist leaves1991 · 32 citations