PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2006SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología150 citationsOpen Access

Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials

AVAndrew J. Vickers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Technological developments, particularly the Internet, have made data sharing generally a trivial logistical problem. Data sharing should come to be seen as an inherent part of conducting a randomized trial, similar to the way in which we consider ethical review and publication of study results. Journals and funding bodies should insist that trialists make raw data available, for example, by publishing data on the Web. If the clinical trial community continues to fail with respect to data sharing, we will only strengthen the public perception that we do clinical trials to benefit ourselves, not our patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrew J. Vickers (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc384e4f901957bec0fd8chttps://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-15
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Authors should make their data available2001 · 16 citations
  2. 2Making original data from clinical studies available for alternative analysis.1997 · 35 citations
  3. 3Authors should make their data available2001 · 14 citations
  4. 4Publishing raw data and real time statistical analysis on e-journals2001 · 37 citations
  5. 5Submission of Microarray Data to Public Repositories2004 · 123 citations