PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2015Materials882 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS

WWWenzheng WuPGPeng GengGLGuiwei Li

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), which could surmount these shortcomings. This paper is devoted to studying the influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Samples with three different layer thicknesses (200, 300 and 400 μm) and raster angles (0°, 30° and 45°) were built using a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) 3D printing system and their tensile, compressive and bending strengths were tested. The optimal mechanical properties of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples were found at a layer thickness of 300 μm and a raster angle of 0°. To evaluate the printing performance of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples, a comparison was made between the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. The results suggest that the average tensile strengths of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) parts were 108% higher than those for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and compressive strengths were 114% and bending strengths were 115%. However, the modulus of elasticity for both materials was similar. These results indicate that the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) are superior to 3D-printed ABS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc452545b398e6439f56dbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling2001 · 728 citations
  2. 2Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition1996 · 403 citations
  3. 3Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS2002 · 2,364 citations
  4. 4Mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of metal fiber‐filled polymer composites1979 · 204 citations
  5. 5Solid freeform fabrication of metal components using fused deposition of metals2002 · 143 citations