PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026Telecommunications Policy0 citationsOpen Access

New reality of public service media journalists: How generative AI redefines journalism and work practices

View Full Paper
VMVaclav MoravecBGBeáta GavurováMRMartin Rigelský

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how generative AI is transforming journalism work practices and perceptions in the Czech public service media.
  • Conducted two waves of tracking research in 2023 and 2024.
  • Focused on the Czech News Agency and its journalists.
  • Analyzed the intensity of GenAI tool usage across various professional roles in media.
  • Increased use of GenAI tools noted in both editorial and non-editorial positions by 2024.
  • Strong belief persists that AI will not replace journalists in the next five years.
  • Stable perceptions of AI in public service media indicating high acceptance of technology.

Abstract

The main goal of the study was to capture the new reality of journalists in the public service media in the Czech Republic, particularly in the Czech News Agency (Česká tisková kancelář, ČTK) in the context of the rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) after the release of ChatGPT in November 2022. The Czech News Agency is one of the most important public service media. Our study tries to capture the transformation of the use of GenAI and the perception of future in journalism through two waves of tracking research (2023 and 2024). Between 2023 and 2024, an increase in the intensive use of GenAI tools was recorded in ČTK. Higher intensity of GenAI use was found in the editorial positions as well as in the non-editorial positions, especially in 2024 that declares an expansion in the use of GenAI outside of traditional editorial tasks. The opinion persisted among employees in 2024 that AI would not replace journalists within five years, but that a new hybrid model of collaboration between journalists and technology would be created. The frequency of GenAI use had no impact on these attitudes, confirming the homogeneous perception of GenAI among professions. Graphic designers and software engineers were considered the most affected professions by AI, while journalists and teachers were identified as the least affected professions by GenAI. The outcomes demonstrate a relatively stable perception and pragmatic acceptance of AI technologies in public service media in the current period as well as in the future. • Future journalism perception through capturing alteration in GenAI use. • GenAI use frequency does not impact alteration in journalists' positions in future. • Increasing integration of GenAI tools into various profession types in news media. • Significance of collaboration ties in internal and external media ecosystem. • Changing demands in journalistic work positions under the GenAI influence in future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moravec et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc87983afacbeac03e9d42https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103210
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Between Anticipation and Impact: Assessing Generative AI’s Influence on Journalistic Labor and Employment2026
  2. 2Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in News: A case study of selected digital-native news outlets in Zimbabwe2025
  3. 3Smart Generative Media: Analyzing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools (Such as ChatGPT, Midjourney) on Journalistic and Creative Content Production2026
  4. 4Shifting job expectations in the era of generative AI hype – perspectives of journalists and copywriters2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Generative artificial intelligence and the transformation of journalism: Reconfiguring news production, media ethics, and communication patterns2026