PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Spectral Geoid: Convergent Mode Structure of Wigner Surmise Residuals

View Full Paper
JWJon Wiberg

Key Points

  • The aim is to address the divergence in Wigner surmise residuals and establish a stable decomposition method.
  • Identification of the divergence in polynomial mode coefficients at high beta values.
  • Introduction of the Hellinger deviation as a natural decomposition variable.
  • Analysis of the variance mode's dominance across different repulsion strengths.
  • Findings reveal the variance mode consistently influences residuals, ranging from 80% at GOE to 51% at GSE.
  • An exact relationship linking variance mode coefficients and variance excess is established.
  • Demonstrates an inversion of mode hierarchy in Berry–Robnik mixed spectra beyond a chaotic fraction.

Abstract

For fifty years, random matrix theorists have decomposed spacing distribution residuals into polynomial modes weighted by the Wigner surmise — and for fifty years, that decomposition has been silently divergent above β = 1. Somewhat unnoticed, because everyone truncated the series and reported power fractions as if they were meaningful. They weren't: at β = 4 (GSE), the polynomial coefficients grow by a factor of 400 over ten modes. The "kurtosis dominance" reported at large β was never a physical transition — it was the highest retained mode absorbing the divergence. This paper identifies the problem and fixes it. The natural decomposition variable is the Hellinger deviation h = √ (Pbulk/PW) − 1, which lies in L² (PW) at all β by a trivial but apparently unnoticed bound. In the convergent Hellinger basis, the variance mode dominates at every repulsion strength — from 80% at GOE to 51% at GSE — meaning the Wigner surmise residual is always primarily a width change, never a shape distortion. The "dominance reversal" was an artifact of expanding a function that doesn't belong to the space. Three additional results: An exact, closed-form identity connecting the variance mode coefficient to the variance excess ε (β) via gamma-function ratios (Proposition 2), explaining the empirically observed c₂/ε ≈ 0. 73 as a near-cancellation. A mode hierarchy inversion in Berry–Robnik mixed spectra at chaotic fraction ρ ≈ 0. 6, with a measurement horizon at ρ ≈ 0. 97 beyond which the geoid becomes featureless. A negative result on βc = π: five natural geometric constructions fail to detect it as a curvature feature; the critical value is algebraic (a property of the variance excess formula), not geometric (a property of any statistical manifold). The paper completes the two-point layer of the information-geometric programme for spectral statistics, complementing the one-point Brody manifold geometry developed in the companion papers. Paper Role DOI The Instability Compression Principle ICP empirical foundation 10. 5281/zenodo. 18099118 The Compressibility of Chaos (Ordo ab Chao) ICP theoretical derivation: α₀ = 5π² 10. 5281/zenodo. 18834609 Variance Excess ε (β) formula, βc = π — the quantity this paper decomposes 10. 5281/zenodo. 18650473 Information Geometry of the Brody Distribution Fisher metric, one-point layer — the layer this paper complements 10. 5281/zenodo. 18879754 The α-Connection Structure of the Brody Manifold Amari–Chentsov tensor, γE cancellation → ζ-stratification origin 10. 5281/zenodo. 19151206 Dual Symmetries of the Brody Statistical Manifold Z₂×Z₂ symmetry, β*=√2 — the one-point special value vs this paper's βc=π 10. 5281/zenodo. 19239285 The Duality Web of the Brody Statistical Manifold Conjugation-singularity theorem, interval arithmetic methods 10. 5281/zenodo. 19389065 Spiked Random Matrix Signatures of the L-H Transition Experimental Krylov bridge endpoint: σ² (bₙ) diagnostic connected here via §6. 3 10. 5281/zenodo. 19423076 The Spectral Geoid Two-point layer: Hellinger convergence theorem, mode hierarchy, ζ-stratification this paper

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jon Wiberg (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc89183afacbeac03ead75https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19518426
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper