PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Critical Visual Analysis of Hardware Fingerprints in Low-Light RAW Video

View Full Paper
KKeshav

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the origins and characteristics of Fixed-Pattern Noise (FPN) in low-light video imaging.
  • Examined 14 commercial smartphone camera modules under low-light conditions (1 lux)
  • Utilized the AIM 2025 Low-Light RAW Video dataset for analysis
  • Extracted FPN residual heatmaps and spatial Power Spectral Density (PSD) profiles
  • Conducted hierarchical clustering across five distinct scenes
  • FPN is a stable and scene-independent spatial pattern determined by sensor hardware
  • Sharp spikes in row-wise PSD indicate readout electronics as a primary source of banding
  • RMS magnitude of FPN varies significantly (22×) between modules in the same handset
  • Clustering shows structural similarity of FPN does not align with brand but rather with sensor type

Abstract

Digital image sensors operating under extreme lowlight conditions produce imagery that is dominated not only by stochastic photon shot noise but also by a persistent, spatially structured layer of deterministic bias known as Fixed-Pattern Noise (FPN). This paper presents an empirical, graphical analysis of the stability, magnitude, and structural origins of FPN across 14 commercial smartphone camera modules, utilising the AIM 2025 Low-Light RAW Video dataset captured at approximately 1 lux. By extracting and systematically analysing FPN residual heatmaps, spatial Power Spectral Density (PSD) profiles, and hierarchical clustering dendrograms across five physically distinct scenes, the following principal findings are established. First, FPN constitutes a stable, scene-independent spatial pattern whose structure is governed primarily by the sensor hardware. Second, sharp harmonic spikes in row-wise PSD profiles implicate periodic column-parallel readout electronics as the dominant source of deterministic banding. Third, the RMS magnitude of FPN varies by a factor of approximately 22× between modules housed within the same handset. Fourth, hierarchical clustering reveals that FPN structural similarity does not conform to brand level grouping; cross-brand affinities instead suggest that the underlying sensor die and module type are more influential than manufacturer identity. These observations highlight the importance of identifying and subtracting deterministic hardware signatures as a prerequisite to effective low-light image enhancement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keshav (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc89473afacbeac03eb0d1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19512373
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reading the Silicon: A Critical Visual Analysis of Hardware Fingerprints in Low-Light RAW Video2026
  2. 2Apple’s Synthetic Defocus Noise Pattern: Characterization and Forensic Applications2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Enhancing PRNU ‐based camera identification by denoising filters and similarity metrics2026
  4. 4LED-based temporal variant noise model for Fourier ptychographic microscopy2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5A Novel Progressive Enhancement of Low Light Raw Images2024