PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2006World Journal of Surgery113 citations

Minimally Invasive Video‐Assisted Parathyroidectomy Versus Open Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy for a Solitary Parathyroid Adenoma: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial

View Full Paper
MBMarcin BarczyńskiSCStanisław CichońAKAleksander Konturek

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Both MIVAP and OMIP offer a valuable approach for solitary parathyroid adenoma with a similar excellent success rate and a minimal morbidity rate. Routine use of the intraoperative iPTH assay is essential in both approaches to avoid surgical failures of overlooked multiglandular disease. The advantages of MIVAP include easier recognition of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), lower pain intensity within 24 hours following surgery, lower analgesia request rate, lower analgesic consumption, shorter scar length, better physical functioning and bodily pain aspects of the quality of life on early recovery, and higher early cosmetic satisfaction rate. However, these advantages are achieved at higher costs because of endoscopic tool involvement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barczyński et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc9b7d34612599f33592d7https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0312-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper