PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 14, 2015Circulation259 citations

Incidence and Clinical Significance of Poststent Optical Coherence Tomography Findings

View Full Paper
TSTsunenari SoedaSUShiro UemuraSPSeung‐Jung Park

Structured PICO

Do abnormal poststent OCT findings predict 1-year device-oriented clinical end points?

P
Population
Patients with poststent Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) findings
I
Intervention
Poststent Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) evaluation for abnormal findings (irregular protrusion and small minimal stent area)
O
Outcome
1-year device-oriented clinical end pointscomposite

Abnormal poststent OCT findings, specifically irregular protrusion and small minimal stent area, are independent predictors of adverse 1-year device-oriented clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Abnormal poststent OCT findings were frequent. Irregular protrusion and small minimal stent area were independent predictors of 1-year device-oriented clinical end points, which were primarily driven by target lesion revascularization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soeda et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc9eac24e766dc31359692https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014704
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper