PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2014Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society369 citationsOpen Access

Magnitude of Cognitive Dysfunction in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Six Cognitive Domains and the Most Frequently Reported Neuropsychological Tests Within Domains

View Full Paper
PPPriya PaltaASAndrea L.C. SchneiderGBGeert Jan Biessels

Structured PICO

Does type 2 diabetes worsen cognitive function in adults compared to nondiabetic controls?

P
Population
26,137 adults (n = 3,351 with type 2 diabetes) from 24 studies
I
Intervention
Type 2 diabetes (exposure)
C
Comparator
Nondiabetic controls
O
Outcome
Effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cognitive dysfunction across six domains (motor function, executive function, processing speed, verbal memory, visual memory, attention/concentration) and specific neuropsychological testssurrogate

Adults with type 2 diabetes exhibit small to moderate cognitive dysfunction across multiple domains compared to nondiabetic controls, particularly in motor function, executive function, and processing speed.

Abstract

The objectives were to conduct a meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards to determine effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cognitive dysfunction in adults with type 2 diabetes, relative to nondiabetic controls, and to obtain effect sizes for the most commonly reported neuropsychological tests within domains. Twenty-four studies, totaling 26,137 patients (n = 3351 with diabetes), met study inclusion criteria. Small to moderate effect sizes were obtained for five of six domains: motor function (3 studies, n = 2374; d = -0.36), executive function (12 studies, n = 1784; d = -0.33), processing speed (16 studies, n = 3076; d = -0.33), verbal memory (15 studies, n = 4,608; d = -0.28), and visual memory (6 studies, n = 1754; d = -0.26). Effect size was smallest for attention/concentration (14 studies, n = 23,143; d = -0.19). The following tests demonstrated the most notable performance decrements in diabetes samples: Grooved Pegboard (dominant hand) (d = -0.60), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (immediate) (d = -0.40), Trails B (d = -0.39), Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure (delayed) (d = -0.38), Trails A (d = -0.34), and Stroop Part I (d = -0.28). This study provides effect sizes to power future epidemiological and clinical diabetes research studies examining cognitive function and to help inform the selection of neuropsychological tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Palta et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcd72a98c6111533e54526https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617713001483
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper