PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2018Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine66 citationsOpen Access

Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

LZLingjie ZhouMNMadhuri NatarajanBMBruce S. Miller

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This is the first study to assess the MIDs for the VR-12 and SANE scores in patients with rotator cuff disease. The estimates of MID will facilitate the interpretation and application of these outcome measures in clinical practice and research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dce488d111c0385b3597a8https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118782159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies2016 · 272 citations
  2. 2Correlation of a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Rating With Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System and IKDC Subjective Total Scores for Patients After ACL Reconstruction or Knee Arthroscopy2012 · 133 citations
  3. 3Indications for Rotator Cuff Repair2006 · 356 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of the meaningfulness of health‐related quality of life improvements as assessed by the SF‐36 and the EQ‐5D VAS in patients with active Crohn’s disease2009 · 137 citations
  5. 5Living with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear ‘bad days, bad nights’: a qualitative study2014 · 90 citations