PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 14, 2015Stroke80 citationsOpen Access

Validation of the 9-Point and 24-Point Hematoma Expansion Prediction Scores and Derivation of the PREDICT A/B Scores

View Full Paper
THThien HuynhRARichard I. AvivDDDar Dowlatshahi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The 9- and 24-point expansion scores demonstrate acceptable discrimination in an independent multicenter cohort; however, calibration was suboptimal for the 9-point score. The PREDICT A score showed improved discrimination for HE prediction but requires independent validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huynh et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd0925ceb896e1a0e52d91https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.009893
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study2012 · 643 citations
  2. 2Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients?2002 · 245 citations
  3. 3PATHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS IN HYPERTENSIVE CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE1971 · 536 citations
  4. 4The ICH Score2001 · 2,197 citations
  5. 5Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage2011 · 650 citations