PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 2016BMC Bioinformatics60 citationsOpen Access

A scalability study of phylogenetic network inference methods using empirical datasets and simulations involving a single reticulation

HHHussein A. HejaseKLKevin J. Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We conclude that the state of the art of phylogenetic network inference lags well behind the scope of current phylogenomic studies. New algorithmic development is critically needed to address this methodological gap.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hejase et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd12de7a14526fc01332dehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1277-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2002/2003/20042004 · 483 citations
  2. 2Comparison of phylogenetic trees1981 · 2,972 citations
  3. 3Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading1978 · 2,947 citations
  4. 4Evolution of Protein Molecules1969 · 11,236 citations
  5. 5Some applications of statistical phylogenetics : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomathematics at Massey University2009 · 3 citations