PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2016American Law and Economics Review56 citations

Do Judges’ Characteristics Matter? Ethnicity, Gender, and Partisanship in Texas State Trial Courts

View Full Paper
CLClaire LimBSBernardo SilveiraJSJames M. Snyder

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We explore how government officials’ behavior varies with their ethnicity, gender, and political orientation. Specifically, we analyze criminal sentencing decisions in Texas state district courts using data on approximately half a million criminal cases from 2004 to 2013. We exploit randomized case assignments within counties and obtain precisely estimated effects of judges’ ethnicity, gender, and political orientation that are near zero, conditional on geographic factors. However, we find substantial cross-judge heterogeneity in sentencing. Exploiting a unique overlapping structure of Texas state district courts, we find no evidence that this heterogeneity is driven by judges pandering to voters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd1432d111c0385b359cdfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahw006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination2004 · 4,530 citations
  2. 2Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes1995 · 272 citations
  3. 3Black Elite Decision Making: The Case of Trial Judges1978 · 75 citations
  4. 4Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District‐Level Judicial Demographics2005 · 146 citations
  5. 5Does Officer Race Matter?2014 · 11 citations