PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1992PLANT PHYSIOLOGY953 citationsOpen Access

Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO2

View Full Paper
PHP. C. HarleyDenver School of NursingFLFrancesco LoretoInstitute for Sustainable Plant ProtectionMGMarco GomesPolytechnic Institute of Porto

Key Points

  • To evaluate and compare two theoretical methods for estimating leaf mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide diffusion from photosynthetic response curves.
  • Generated an ideal simulated dataset of photosynthetic rates across a range of stromal CO2 partial pressures to assess the impact of altered mesophyll diffusion conductance.
  • Evaluated the parameter error sensitivity of two mathematical methods using simulated data and validated them using measured leaf gas exchange datasets.
  • Both analytical methods successfully determined mesophyll conductance across synthetic and experimentally measured leaf datasets.
  • Sensitivity analyses revealed that each estimation method exhibits distinct operational strengths and specific sensitivities to parameter uncertainties.

Abstract

The conductance for CO(2) diffusion in the mesophyll of leaves can limit photosynthesis. We have studied two methods for determining the mesophyll conductance to CO(2) diffusion in leaves. We generated an ideal set of photosynthesis rates over a range of partial pressures of CO(2) in the stroma and studied the effect of altering the mesophyll diffusion conductance on the measured response of photosynthesis to intercellular CO(2) partial pressure. We used the ideal data set to test the sensitivity of the two methods to small errors in the parameters used to determine mesophyll conductance. The two methods were also used to determine mesophyll conductance of several leaves using measured rather than ideal data sets. It is concluded that both methods can be used to determine mesophyll conductance and each method has particular strengths. We believe both methods will prove useful in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harley et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd1cd00219ae88a9e52f8chttps://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.4.1429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology1991 · 2,174 citations
  2. 2Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: Physics, physiology and rate limitations1985 · 906 citations
  3. 3Estimation of mesophyll conductance to CO_2 flux by three different methods1992 · 26 citations
  4. 4A Sensitive Assay Procedure for Simultaneous Determination of Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase and Oxygenase Activities1981 · 135 citations
  5. 5Plant Water Status, Leaf Temperature, and the Calculated Mesophyll Resistance to Carbon Dioxide of Cotton Leaves1969 · 100 citations