PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2008Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society241 citationsOpen Access

The initialfinal mass relationship of white dwarfs revisited: effect on the luminosity function and mass distribution

View Full Paper
SCS. CatalnJIJ. IsernEGEnrique Garca-Berro

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The initial-final mass relationship connects the mass of a white dwarf with the mass of its progenitor in the main sequence. Although this function is of fundamental importance to several fields in modern astrophysics, it is not well constrained either from the theoretical or from the observational points of view. In this work, we revise the present semi-empirical initial-final mass relationship by re-evaluating the available data. The distribution obtained from grouping all our results presents a considerable dispersion, which is larger than the uncertainties. We have carried out a weighted least-squares linear fit of these data and a careful analysis to give some clues on the dependence of this relationship on some parameters such as metallicity or rotation. The semi-empirical initial-final mass relationship arising from our study covers the range of initial masses from 1.0 to 6.5 M , including in this way the low-mass domain, poorly studied until recently. Finally, we have also performed a test of the initial-final mass relationship by studying its effect on the luminosity function and on the mass distribution of white dwarfs. This was done by using different initial-final mass relationships from the literature, including the expression derived in this work, and comparing the results obtained with the observational data from the Palomar Green Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that the semi-empirical initial-final mass relationship derived here gives results in good agreement with the observational data, especially in the case of the white dwarf mass distribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cataln et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd2c5cafc13a549f100ef1https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13356.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Differential rotation in rapidly rotating F-stars2003 · 85 citations
  2. 2On the influence of the convective efficiency on the determination of the atmospheric parameters of DA white dwarfs1992 · 56 citations
  3. 3Comprehensive analytic formulae for stellar evolution as a function of mass and metallicity2000 · 937 citations
  4. 4Comprehensive analytic formulae for stellar evolution as a function of mass and metallicity2000 · 1,754 citations
  5. 5White Dwarf Masses-Gravitational Redshifts Revisited1996 · 116 citations