PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2011American Economic Review1,001 citations

Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments

View Full Paper
CFClaudio FerrazFFFrederico Finan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We show that political institutions affect corruption levels. We use audit reports in Brazil to construct new measures of political corruption in local governments and test whether electoral accountability affects the corruption practices of incumbent politicians. We find significantly less corruption in municipalities where mayors can get reelected. Mayors with reelection incentives misappropriate 27 percent fewer resources than mayors without reelection incentives. These effects are more pronounced among municipalities with less access to information and where the likelihood of judicial punishment is lower. Overall our findings suggest that electoral rules that enhance political accountability play a crucial role in constraining politician's corrupt behavior. (JEL D72, K42, O17)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferraz et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4b035ea84e5556101003https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1274
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform2000 · 2,425 citations
  2. 2Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects2005 · 2,962 citations
  3. 3Institutions and Economic Performance2008 · 356 citations
  4. 4Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption2005 · 446 citations
  5. 5Corruption and Growth1995 · 8,486 citations