PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2018Clinical Oral Implants Research265 citationsOpen Access

A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic multiple‐unit fixed dental prostheses

View Full Paper
ISIrena SailerMSMalin StrasdingNVNicola Alberto Valente

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For implant-supported FDPs, conventionally veneered zirconia should not be considered as material selection of first priority, as pronounced risk for framework fractures and chipping of the zirconia veneering ceramic was observed. Monolithic zirconia may be an interesting alternative, but its clinical medium- to long-term outcomes have not been evaluated yet. Hence, metal ceramics seems to stay the golden standard for implant-supported multiple-unit FDPs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sailer et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4b4b0644c7b49d40cb3ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13277
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper