PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2012Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory368 citations

Audit Reporting for Going-Concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis

View Full Paper
ECElizabeth CarsonNFNeil FargherMGMarshall A. Geiger

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

SUMMARY In this synthesis we review research on going-concern modified audit opinions (GCOs) and develop a framework to categorize this research. We identify three major areas of research: (1) determinants of GCOs that include client factors, auditor factors, auditor-client relationships, and other environmental factors; (2) accuracy of GCOs; and (3) consequences arising from GCOs. We identify method-related considerations for researchers working in the area and identify future research opportunities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carson et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4b93fb7610310c101be4https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50324
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AUDITOR LIABILITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STRATEGIC EVALUATION OF GOING CONCERN1999 · 13 citations
  2. 2The philosophy of auditing.1964 · 598 citations
  3. 3Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work?2002 · 135 citations
  4. 4The architecture of expertise: The auditor's going-concern judgement1990 · 6 citations
  5. 5Effects of Expectations, Prior Involvement, and Review Awareness on Memory for Audit Evidence and Judgment1995 · 235 citations