PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2016The Journal of Portfolio Management293 citations

Building Diversified Portfolios that Outperform Out of Sample

View Full Paper
MPMarcos López de Prado

Key Points

  • The aim is to present the Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) method as an effective alternative to traditional quadratic optimizers in portfolio construction.
  • Introduced HRP to overcome issues in quadratic optimization, such as instability and concentration.
  • Applied graph theory and machine-learning techniques for effective portfolio building using the covariance matrix.
  • Performed Monte Carlo experiments to test HRP's out-of-sample performance against traditional methods.
  • HRP achieved lower out-of-sample variance compared to Markowitz's Critical Line Algorithm (CLA).
  • Portfolios generated by HRP exhibited reduced risk compared to those created using traditional risk parity methods.

Abstract

In this article, the author introduces the Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) approach to address three major concerns of quadratic optimizers, in general, and Markowitz’s critical line algorithm (CLA), in particular: instability, concentration, and underperformance. HRP applies modern mathematics (graph theory and machine-learning techniques) to build a diversified portfolio based on the information contained in the covariance matrix. However, unlike quadratic optimizers, HRP does not require the invertibility of the covariance matrix. In fact, HRP can compute a portfolio on an ill-degenerated or even a singular covariance matrix—an impossible feat for quadratic optimizers. Monte Carlo experiments show that HRP delivers lower out-ofsample variance than CLA, even though minimum variance is CLA’s optimization objective. HRP also produces less risky portfolios out of sample compared to traditional risk parity methods. TOPICS:Statistical methods, portfolio construction

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marcos López de Prado (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd5be97dbdc4ad1440c57ahttps://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.4.059
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Portfolio Constraints and the Fundamental Law of Active Management2002 · 255 citations
  2. 2Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection2003 · 1,722 citations
  3. 3Pseudo-Mathematics and Financial Charlatanism: The Effects of Backtest Overfitting on Out-of-Sample Performance2014 · 206 citations
  4. 4Risk-Based Investing but What Risk(s)?2015 · 5 citations
  5. 5Stochastic flow diagrams2014 · 10 citations