PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 12, 1988Acta Medica Scandinavica

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does direct current conversion with or without antiarrhythmic therapy effectively maintain sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?

Population

100 consecutive patients admitted in 1980-82 for direct current conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

2 years

Authors

TLTorbjörn LundströmLRLars Rydén

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

DC cardioversion yields low sinus rhythm maintenance in chronic AF; observational data leave open efficacy of adjunctive antiarrhythmics.

Structured PICO

Does direct current conversion with or without antiarrhythmic therapy effectively maintain sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
100 consecutive patients admitted in 1980-82 for direct current conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF)
I
Intervention
Direct current conversion (first attempt without class I antiarrhythmics; subsequent attempts for relapses with quinidine or disopyramide)
O
Outcome
Proportion of patients maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) at one and two yearssurrogate

A first attempt at direct current conversion without antiarrhythmics identifies a substantial proportion of chronic AF patients who maintain sinus rhythm without prophylactic therapy, with diminishing returns after two conversions.

Cite This Study

Lundström et al. (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd62d07dbdc4ad1440c806https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb15764.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share