PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Automated O-RADS Risk Stratification Using a Large Language Model Analysis of Narrative Ultrasound Reports

YGYanhui GuoJGJingjing GongRJRuquan Jiang

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop an automated O-RADS scoring system using a large language model for better efficiency and accuracy.
  • Developed a two-stage pipeline for automated O-RADS classification.
  • Utilized the Lingshu LLM to extract diagnostic features from narrative ultrasound reports.
  • Trained and evaluated multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting O-RADS scores.
  • Achieved an accuracy of 0.803 with logistic regression using Lingshu model embeddings.
  • Obtained a weighted-average F1-score of 0.819.
  • Achieved a macro-averaged AUROC of 0.948, outperforming the MedGemma model.

Abstract

Background: The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is essential for standardizing the risk stratification of ovarian lesions detected on ultrasound.However, manual assignment of O-RADS scores is timeconsuming and can vary between observers.This study investigates an automated method for O-RADS scoring using a large language model (LLM) to analyze narrative ultrasound reports.Methods: A two-stage pipeline was developed for automated O-RADS classification.Initially, the Lingshu LLM, specialized in medical language, extracted and embedded features from free-text descriptions of ovarian lesions.It identified key diagnostic features mentioned by sonologists.Subsequently, these features were used to train and evaluate several machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machines and random forests, to predict O-RADS scores (1-5).Results: The proposed method was evaluated on a dataset of 513 cases using fivefold cross-validation.The pipeline using Lingshu model embeddings with LR achieved the highest accuracy of 0.803 95% CI: 0.753, 0.853, a weighted-average F1-score of 0.819 95% CI: 0.777, 0.861 and a macro-averaged AUROC of 0.948 95% CI: 0.937, 0.959.This outperformed the MedGemma model's pipeline, which had an accuracy of 0.760 95% CI: 0.700, 0.820, F1-score of 0.787 95% CI: 0.739, 0.835 and AUROC of 0.941 95% CI: 0.911, 0.971. Conclusion:This study introduces a novel approach to automate O-RADS scoring using LLMs for feature extraction and traditional machine learning for classification.The results indicate that this method can accurately stratify ovarian cancer risk, potentially improving clinical workflow efficiency and reducing diagnostic variability.This approach may support radiologists in making more consistent and timely assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd938e195c95cdefd67c8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.03.009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper