PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research0 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Circadian-Aligned Melatonin Supplementation on Pain and Hormonal Fluctuations in Women with Luteal Phase Dysfunction

AJAseel Mosa Jabber

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of circadian-aligned melatonin on progesterone levels and symptom burden in women with luteal phase dysfunction.
  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  • Involved 100 women aged 22-35 with confirmed luteal phase dysfunction
  • Participants received melatonin (3 mg) or placebo at 9:00 PM from cycle day 14-25 for three cycles
  • Primary outcomes included serum progesterone concentrations and ovulatory confirmation
  • Secondary outcomes assessed pain and symptom burden using visual analogue scale and daily record of severity of problems.
  • Melatonin group had significantly higher day 21 progesterone levels (median 9.85 ng/mL vs. 8.78 ng/mL, P<0.0001)
  • Day 24 progesterone levels also higher in melatonin group (mean 11.15 ng/mL vs. 9.05 ng/mL, P=0.0021)
  • 32.0% of melatonin group exceeded 10 ng/mL on day 21 compared to 10.0% in placebo (P=0.0141)
  • Melatonin reduced symptom burden as indicated by lower DRSP mean scores (45.14 vs. 52.16, P=0.0071)
  • No significant differences in pain scores or ovulation confirmation rates.

Abstract

Background secondary outcomes comprised ovulation confirmation, pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), and symptom burden (Daily Record of Severity of Problems, DRSP).Results: Baseline demographic and cycle characteristics were comparable between the two groups. By cycle 3, the melatonin group demonstrated significantly higher day 21 progesterone (median 9.85 ng/mL IQR 9.66-13.40 vs. 8.78 6.73–9.81, P<0.0001) and day 24 progesterone (mean±SD 11.15±3.47 ng/mL vs. 9.05±3.14 ng/mL, P=0.0021). A greater proportion exceeded the ≥10 ng/mL threshold on day 21 (32.0% vs. 10.0%, P=0.0141). DRSP luteal mean scores were significantly lower with melatonin (45.14±14.84 vs. 52.16±10.17, P=0.0071), indicating reduced symptom burden. No significant between-group differences were found in VAS pain scores or ≥30% pain reduction rates. Ovulation confirmation rates were similar in the two groups.Conclusion: Circadian-aligned melatonin supplementation significantly improved luteal progesterone profiles and reduced overall luteal-phase symptom severity in women with LPD, without a statistically significant effect on mean pain scores. These findings support melatonin’s potential as a low-risk, non-hormonal adjunct targeting both endocrine and symptomatic dimensions of LPD, meriting further investigation in fertility-focused trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aseel Mosa Jabber (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9b1e195c95cdefd6ff6https://doi.org/10.24200/jogcr.11.5.401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper