PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Transparency in Psychometric Reporting : A Review of Scales for Well-Being and Quality of Life in Older Persons Employing Rasch Analysis

View Full Paper
MPMarit PreuterMMMarie-Louise MöllerbergKÅKristofer Årestedt

Key Points

  • Evaluate the reporting quality of studies using Rasch analysis for well-being and QoL scales for older people.
  • Identified articles through a systematic review of psychometric studies.
  • Focused on studies employing Rasch analysis for well-being and QoL scales.
  • Assessed the reporting of measurement properties in the selected studies.
  • Notable deficiencies found in the reporting of measurement properties.
  • Indicated substantial room for improvement in scale reporting.
  • Emphasized that better reporting is essential for evidence-based conclusions.

Abstract

There is a growing interest in assessing well-being and quality of life (QoL) among older people. To ensure that evidence-based scales are used for this purpose, comprehensive and transparent reporting of measurement properties is an essential first step. This study aimed to evaluate the reporting quality of studies that used Rasch analysis to assess scales designed to measure well-being or QoL in older persons. Articles employing Rasch analysis were identified through a previous broader systematic review of psychometric studies. The findings demonstrate notable deficiencies in the reporting of measurement properties, indicating substantial room for improvement. While detailed reporting alone cannot guarantee that scales possess satisfactory measurement quality, it constitutes a prerequisite for drawing evidence-based conclusions about their measurement quality. Improved reporting practices are essential not only for enhancing the interpretability and replicability of individual studies but also for enabling informed decisions in clinical and policy contexts regarding the use of well-being and QoL scales for older populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Preuter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9cae195c95cdefd71f8https://doi.org/10.65301/emp.2026.264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What’s in the Scales? A Systematic Review of Content Overlap in Well-being and Quality of Life Scales for Older Persons2025
  2. 2A Review of Generic Frameworks and Scales for Measuring Quality of Life and Well-Being: Toward Finding the Right Ruler2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Psychometric properties of Lehman’s quality of life interview and its modifications: a systematic review using the COSMIN methodology2026
  4. 4Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations2023 · 2,066 citations
  5. 5Measuring what matters: An environmental scan and quality appraisal of population well-being surveys2025