PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026International Journal of Dental Hygiene0 citations

Impact of Magnetized Water on Salivary pH , Salivary Flow Rate and the Streptococcal Mutant Colony Count in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
NVN. VigneshwaranAMAruchunan MooventhanCYChidambaram Yogapriya

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effects of magnetized water rinses on salivary pH, flow rate, and Streptococcus mutans counts in healthy individuals.
  • Randomized controlled trial design
  • Fifty healthy participants divided into magnetized water group and normal water group
  • Participants rinsed for 2 minutes daily for 2 weeks
  • Pre- and post-intervention assessments conducted
  • Statistical analysis using SPSS version 16
  • Significant reduction in salivary pH in both groups (p = 0.001 for MWG; p = 0.003 for NWG)
  • Significant reduction in Streptococcus mutans colony count in both groups (p < 0.001)
  • Significant increase in salivary flow rate in the magnetized water group (p = 0.002), not in the normal water group (p = 0.081)
  • Between-group results showed a significant reduction in mutans count for the magnetized water group compared to the normal water group (p = 0.005)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Saliva, a complex fluid with various chemical and physical properties, significantly influences oral health. Its secretion plays a vital role in maintaining oral cavity health, and Streptococcus mutans is more prevalent in areas surrounding caries and exhibits a close relationship with the disease. Magnets are believed to be robust safeguards against illness and serve as highly beneficial preventive tools. Hence, we intended to evaluate the effects of magnetized water oral rinse on salivary pH, salivary flow rate and the Streptococcal mutant colony count in healthy individuals. Materials and Methods In this randomized controlled study, fifty participants were divided into either a magnetized water group (MWG; n = 25) or a normal water group (NWG; n = 25). The MWG underwent oral rinsing using magnetized water, whereas the NWG underwent oral rinsing using normal water for 2 min a day, daily for 2 weeks. Assessments were performed before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed with the appropriate statistical test using SPSS, version 16. Result Within‐Groups analysis showed a significant reduction in salivary pH MWG ( p = 0.001); NWG ( p = 0.003), and Streptococcal mutants colony count ( p < 0.001 in both the groups) in both groups, with a significant increase in salivary flow rate only in the MWG ( p = 0.002), unlike NWG ( p = 0.081). However, between‐group analysis showed a significant reduction in the Streptococcal mutant colony count in the MWG compared to the NWG ( p = 0.005). Conclusion Oral rinsing using magnetized water is effective in reducing Streptococcal mutant colony count and increasing salivary flow rate compared to oral rinsing using normal water. However, further studies with a larger sample size are recommended to warrant the results of the study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vigneshwaran et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9e1e195c95cdefd73f9https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70062
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper