PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research0 citations

Adaptive water use strategies of Mongolian pine plantations in response to mining subsidence across two soil types: a case study in Northwest China

View Full Paper
HWHaoyan WeiYLYJ LuXZXuguang Zhang

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how mining subsidence affects water use strategies in Mongolian pine plantations across different soil types.
  • Utilized an isotopic mixing model based on δ2H and δ18O to analyze water use.
  • Measured δ13C, soil water content, and root distributions in subsidence and non-subsidence areas.
  • Compared water use strategies in sandy and loess soils.
  • Subsidence increases deep soil water availability (>80 cm) and root growth, particularly in loess areas.
  • In sandy soils, deep water uptake was similar in both subsidence and non-subsidence areas.
  • Significantly higher deep water uptake was observed in subsidence plots in loess areas compared to non-subsidence.
  • A decrease in leaf δ13C values indicated reduced water stress in both soil types due to deep water utilization.

Abstract

Abstract Understanding plant water use strategies is critical for managing and restoring ecosystems affected by coal mining subsidence. However, how subsidence impacts water use strategies, especially across different soil types, remains inadequately explored. To address this gap, we employed a continuous isotopic mixing model (based on δ2H and δ18O), coupled with δ13C, soil water content and root distribution, to investigate the differences in water use strategies of Mongolian pine plantations in coal mining subsidence and non-subsidence areas with sandy and loess soils. Our results show that subsidence induces preferential flow, increases deep soil water (80 cm), and enhances root growth and soil water-root coupling, especially in the loess areas. Isotopic mixing modeling revealed that in sandy areas, deep soil water uptake was similar between non-subsidence (79.43 ± 3.83%) and subsidence (82.69 ± 1.52%) plots. In loess areas, subsidence plots (26.36 ± 1.98%) had significantly higher deep water uptake than non-subsidence plots (16.23 ± 1.91%, P .01). Leaf δ13C values decreased significantly in both soil types under subsidence, indicating reduced water stress via deep water utilization, particularly in loess areas. Soil-type dependent response highlights the necessity for distinct vegetation maintenance or restoration strategies in subsided areas across different soil matrices. These findings advance understanding of plant survival strategies and water resource relationships in subsidence zones, providing valuable references for sustainable land and water management in mining-impacted areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9f9e195c95cdefd772bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpag029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The dimensions of deep-layer soil desiccation and its impact on xylem hydraulic conductivity in dryland tree plantations2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Water Uptake Characteristics of Stipa bungeana Trin: Affected by Subsidence in the Coal Mining Areas of Northwest China2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Dataset of soil hydraulic parameters in the Yellow River Basin based on in situ deep sampling2024 · 16 citations
  4. 4Water transport through tall trees: A vertically explicit, analytical model of xylem hydraulic conductance in stems2018 · 75 citations
  5. 5Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis2007 · 6,512 citations