PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

BRICS+ and Alternative Global Sovereignty

View Full Paper
JSJubaer Shah

Key Points

  • The study examines how BRICS+ alters concepts of sovereignty and governance in the global context.
  • Analysis of legal theory and political philosophy
  • Case studies of BRICS+ member states
  • Comparison with Western institutions
  • BRICS+ prioritizes sovereignty and non-intervention
  • Challenges Western-dominated legal structures
  • Indicates a shift towards pluralistic governance models

Abstract

The enlargement of BRICS+ including Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and newly affiliated partner states has sparked renewed debates over the global order. This study's central argument is that, in contrast with Western-dominated institutions, BRICS+ prioritises sovereignty, non-intervention, economic multipolarity, and alternative interpretations of human rights, thereby actively challenging international legal structures and reshaping the contours of an emerging "new global order." The paper uses legal theory, political philosophy, and case studies to show that BRICS+ signals a shift to pluralistic governance models, with important implications for enforcing human rights, organising global economic governance, and legitimising multilateral institutions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jubaer Shah (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddda0de195c95cdefd7937https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19546262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper