PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2011SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1,176 citationsOpen Access

Three generations of distance education pedagogy

TATerry AndersonAthabasca UniversityJDJon DronUniversity of Brighton

Key Points

  • The paper aims to define and analyze three distinct generations of distance education pedagogy.
  • Examined the cognitive-behaviourist, social constructivist, and connectivist pedagogies.
  • Utilized the community of inquiry model to evaluate pedagogical effectiveness.
  • Discussed the implications for distance education designers, teachers, and content developers.
  • Identified key features of the three pedagogical generations in distance education.
  • Highlighted that effective distance education incorporates elements from all three pedagogies.
  • Emphasized the importance of openness and explicitness in distance education contexts.

Abstract

This paper defines and examines three generations of distance education pedagogy. Unlike earlier classifications of distance education based on the technology used, this analysis focuses on the pedagogy that defines the learning experiences encapsulated in the learning design. The three generations of cognitive-behaviourist, social constructivist, and connectivist pedagogy are examined, using the familiar community of inquiry model (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) with its focus on social, cognitive, and teaching presences. Although this typology of pedagogies could also be usefully applied to campus-based education, the need for and practice of openness and explicitness in distance education content and process makes the work especially relevant to distance education designers, teachers, and developers. The article concludes that high-quality distance education exploits all three generations as determined by the learning content, context, and learning expectations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anderson et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de65637ed287395e558b50https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper