PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 4, 2011Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice43 citations

Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta‐analytical review

View Full Paper
STSaskia M. TuijnFJF.J.G. JanssensPRPaul Robben

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

On average, although all types of interventions are effective, improving the diagnostic instrument seems to be the most effective. Especially when highly technical instruments were concerned, improvement proved to be very effective (β = 0.52). Because instrumental variables constitute a major source of error, improving the instrument is an important approach. However, this review offers solid arguments that can complement the literature and practice, with a focus on training the user of the instrument.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tuijn et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de7e4dfd84e72eb255867bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01705.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper