PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1999Review of African Political Economy299 citationsOpen Access

African rural labour, income diversification & livelihood approaches: a long‐term development perspective

View Full Paper
DBDeborah Fahy Bryceson

Key Points

  • To explore the implications of income diversification on rural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Analyzed socioeconomic changes following economic liberalization and structural adjustment programs.
  • Examined the patterns of rural income diversification over the last fifteen years.
  • Investigated the effects of urban migration and labor shifts on rural community dynamics.
  • Income diversification has become crucial for rural households coping with economic changes.
  • Diversification increases wealth differentiation among rural populations, impacting social structures.
  • The sustainability of current rural livelihood strategies is questioned due to these transformations.

Abstract

The implementation of SAP and economic liberalisation throughout sub‐Saharan Africa during the last fifteen years has coincided with the rapid expansion of rural income diversification. Many analysts see income diversification as a vital coping strategy for the rural poor, while recognising that its growing incidence amongst all sections of the African rural population can serve as a mechanism for increasing wealth differentiation. The current income diversification and livelihoods literature primarily restricts itself to situational analysis underpinned by assumptions of economic optimization on the part of decision‐making households, while ignoring the broader process of depeasantization. Early agrarian change took the form of urban migration, funnelling labour from rural areas and creating an array of stimuli that acted indirectly upon village life. Rural income diversification adds a new, more immediate dimension. Villagers are now actively part of in situ occupational change that has far‐reaching implications for the social coherence of rural households and the political balance of local communities and nation‐states. Such profound transformation calls into question the ‘sustainability’ of rural livelihood strategies now being advocated by donor agencies as well as the relevance of delineating formal, informal and peasant sectors of the national economy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deborah Fahy Bryceson (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de8906210a0977fce94990https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249908704377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper